Beachcomber Days
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462953257
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Waldport, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032678153
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,876
- Expenses
- $27,784
- Assets
- $75,428
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tammy Abele (President)
- Jason Vorderbrueggen (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Tianne Waddell-Rios (Secretary)
- Tammy Abele (President)
- Jason Vorderbrueggen (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Beachcomber Days, our mission is to not only bring together the community for a fun-filled celebration but also to empower and support the next generation through our scholarship opportunities. We believe in providing educational opportunities for children, nurturing their talents, and helping them achieve their dreams. Through our scholarship program, we aim to inspire and empower young minds, fostering their growth and development. By combining the joyous spirit of Beachcomber Days with the opportunity to invest in the future of our youth, we strive to create a vibrant and inclusive community that values education and encourages the pursuit of excellence. Together, we can make a difference in the lives of children, opening doors to a brighter future and creating a legacy of success for generations to come.
What it reported doing in 2024
Scholarships approved and released funds to educational organizations attended by awardees. Hosted community events for Beachcomber Days, Christmas & family fun events that supported organizations and individuals in the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 54.3%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -47.2%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.71; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 54.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.