Beach Food Pantry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651221385
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kitty Hawk, NC, USA
- Phone
- 2522612756
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,071,866
- Expenses
- $1,258,515
- Assets
- $1,085,262
- Liabilities
- $146,491
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELE GODSEY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN BENSON (DIRECTOR)
- CHRISTIANA BRYANT (DIRECTOR)
- BRENDA DAVIS-WILLIAMS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Beach food pantry distributes food and personal hygiene supplies to those in need in dare county, North Carolina.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, beach food pantry used 10 different distribution methods to ensure that no one in dare county had to worry about where their next meal would come from. Together, these programs served thousands of neighbors facing crisis or emergency situations - and gave them hope. We distributed almost 500,000 lbs of food, the equivalent of 416,667 total meals. 1. Client-choice, myplate-aligned pantry our flagship program in kitty hawk provides two weeks of free groceries based on family size. Guests "shop" for the foods that work best for their households, encouraging dignity and choice. Open hours: monday-friday, 2-4 pm (except major holidays) 2024 impact: served 5,699 individuals (from 2,881 households). 2. Online ordering for neighbors who can't come during pantry hours - due to work schedules or childcare needs, or for those with limited storage space - we offer online ordering with flexible pick up, monday-friday, 8 am -5 pm. 3. Mobile pantry special events transportation can be a major barrier, so we bring food to areas of highest need. In 2024, we continued monthly produce-focused events at the manteo public library from january-may, serving over 100 households each month. 4. Mass text distribution events when we have extra food, we alert clients via mass text so nothing goes to waste. These smaller distributions don't count toward their annual visit limit - just one more way we stretch resources and help neighbors. 5. Summer food for kids when school is out, families face higher grocery costs and fewer meal options. Our 16-week program provided weekly groceries - including eggs, dairy, meats, and fresh produce - with pick-up or home delivery (south of Oregon inlet and now also to manteo, wanchese, manns harbor, and stumpy point). 2024 impact: served 6,183 individuals (from 1,571 households). 6. Holiday meals holidays can be hard when budgets are tight. Our holiday meals program gave 495 households (comprised of 1,271 individuals) everything they needed to prepare a festive meal, with culturally appropriate and dietary-specific options. 7. Home delivery for shut-ins for elderly or homebound neighbors, we continued to offer direct delivery to ensure they never go without food. 8. Produce stands fresh produce is made available in our front parking lot whenever we have surplus donations or need to clear perishables before extended closures. No appointment required - anyone in need can stop by and take what they can use. 9. Pantry garden our volunteer-built raised-bed garden grows items we know clients love but rarely receive in donations - like okra and specialty eggplants. Clients can even harvest food themselves outside business hours if they're in an emergency. 10. Fresh for all food co-op in 2024, we piloted a food co-op designed to empower participating households by giving them greater choice and ownership over the food they receive. Members contributed volunteer time and, in return, gained access to an expanded selection of groceries, fresh produce, and culturally relevant items. This innovative model not only provided food but built community, encouraged collaboration and improved physical and mental health. 18 households participated for the entire pilot. Beyond food: fns & resource assistance we also help clients apply for food & nutrition services (fns) benefits and connect them with other local resources so they can get back on their feet and move toward self-sufficiency.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $22.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.