BCDI Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841916038
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Peoria, IL, United States
Phone
(309) 692-5337
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$250,886
Expenses
$102,262
Assets
$340,760
Liabilities
$37,836

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL TARANTINO (PRESIDENT)
  • REBECCA BURNS (VICE PRESIDENT / SECRETARY)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL TARANTINO (PRESIDENT): $1,007,874 total reported compensation
  • REBECCA BURNS (VICE PRESIDENT / SECRETARY): $365,083 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the BCDI Foundation is to raise crucial funds and awareness for the services BCDI supplies outside of our clinic walls, including scholarship programs, support of BCDI research, emergency financial assistance, and many other initiatives that impact the lives of those we serve. BCDI’s clinical care team is at the heart of our services. Open communication and collaboration are imperative to the health of our patients, and BCDI feels it is vital to our mission to work as a team for the greatest care of our patient. Our team of hematologists, nurses and other specialists are highly trained in treating all patients with bleeding and clotting disorders. Together, our clinical care team will help you manage your condition by providing proper education and guidance, all while helping minimize the impact of your condition on your daily life. The BCDI care team at our...

What it reported doing in 2025

The bcdi foundation, through the generous support of our donors, offers the green family scholarship for patients with bleeding and clotting disorders to further their education. The scholarship can be used towards accredited higher education programs including vocational/trade school, junior college, or four-year college/university.each year, up to five recipients are chosen to receive an award of a $1,500.00 scholarship to cover the cost of tuition, book fees and other course fees for the period of one academic year. The scholarship is to assist individuals in gaining and furthering their higher or technical education. The scholarship will be paid directly to the school of the recipient's choice upon confirmation that the student has enrolled. Each scholarship will be carefully selected by a committee that determines the recipient(s) of that scholarship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 6
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 7
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 59.2%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.33; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 46.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 32.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 97.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 3% of revenue deployed · 7.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 4 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.