Bcc Golf Appreciation Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814744115
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Farmers Branch, TX, USA
Phone
9728886054
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Reported finances

Expenses
$3,717
Assets
$23,185
Liabilities
$3,182

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID MCCOOL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID MCCOOL (PRESIDENT)
  • KATHY MCCOOL (SECRETARY)
  • TROY MCCOOL (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase bcc golf members enjoyment of the facility by improving course conditions and providing opportunities for lessons and game improvement. To promote the social interaction between bcc golf members and professional staff. To improve the service received by bcc golf members by supporting educational and training endeavors for the professional golf and course maintenance staffs.

What it reported doing in 2022

Professional golf staff members were reimbursed for educational expenses that improved their abiity to provide quality service to the membership. Professional golf staff was also reimbursed for annual due in order to maintain their licensing to provide instruction to members. Two individuals received these payments in 2022 and all payments were approved by the board. Numerous members benefited from improved services and professional golf lessons.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.24; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -137.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.