Bayview Hunters Point for Community Improvement

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941747575
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4154685100
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,833,260
Expenses
$17,782,834
Assets
$11,632,933
Liabilities
$13,041,402

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES BOUQUIN (CHIEF EXE.): $250,250 total reported compensation
  • DIOMEDES REMIGIO (PHYSICIAN AS): $189,000 total reported compensation
  • DARRELL SMITH (CHIEF OPER.): $182,308 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide support services for the community relating to mental health, substance abuse, youth services & violence prevention.

What it reported doing in 2024

Residential services: bvhpf operates jelani family residential step down, a therapeutic transitional housing program in the bayview for families with a parent who has completed an inpatient sud program. Families stay in a large residential facility and are provided with counseling and support to maintain sobriety, obtain permanent housing and access community resources. Bvhpf also operates holloway house, a transitional housing program in ingleside for formerly homeless families who are also involved in the child welfare system. Arlington residence is an sro apartment building in the tenderloin for formerly homeless adults. Bayview hill gardens and monterey apartments are apartment residences in the bayview and bernal providing low-income housing for formerly homeless families with children. Bvhpf provides case management services at these sites to support residents to maintain their housing and access community resources. Homeless services: bvhpf operates bayview navigation center, a low- threshold, high-service temporary shelter program for over 200 adults experiencing homelessness. Residents are also provided with medical and behavioral health services, along with case management services to obtain permanent housing and access other community resources. The vehicle triage center (closed in 2025) provided unhoused adults living in rvs and other vehicles a temporary safe site. Bvhpf provided case management services to obtain permanent housing and access other community resources. Housing services: bvhpf provides case management services through the rapid re-housing (rrh), flexible housing subsidy pool (fhsp), and emergency housing voucher (ehv) programs. These programs provide previously homeless clients with subsidized supportive housing. Bvhpf case management includes housing retention support, barrier removal services, food security and access to other community resources. Food services: bvhpf operates a weekly food pantry at its bayview community center for low-income families, in the style of a free farmer's market with fresh produce and other healthy groceries. In-custody services: bvhpf provides sud counseling and treatment through the roads to recovery and sisters programs at the san francisco county jail facilities. Bvhpf also provides case management services for pre-released and recently released clients in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $128.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.12; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $250K · 10 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.