Baytown Habitat for Humanity
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760316826
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Baytown, TX, United States
- Phone
- 281-427-0866
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $418,507
- Expenses
- $497,376
- Assets
- $1,125,731
- Liabilities
- $26,878
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YVONNE BRISCOE (PRESIDENT)
- JARED AREND (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- YVONNE BRISCOE (PRESIDENT)
- JARED AREND (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CRISTAN MORALES (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seeking to put God’s love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. Support Our Mission Build Homes. Build Hope. Build Baytown. Every dollar you give helps local families achieve strength, stability, and a safe place to call home. Your gift today changes lives tomorrow. The driving force behind our organization is its volunteers – those who contribute a day, a week, or a few months, to give Habitat’s vision a tangible form. Volunteers, joining with the future homeowner families, provide virtually all house-building labor. Individuals, religious organizations, corporations, and local civic groups that support Habitat’s mission also provide tax-deductible donations of money and materials that make our work possible.Habitat does not build houses for families; it makes alongside those who demonstrate the need and willingness to...
What it reported doing in 2023
Provide housing for economically disadvantaged families
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 99% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $414K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.