Bayonne Hockey Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030600162
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Bayonne, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9734934734
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,743
- Expenses
- $47,219
- Assets
- $22,972
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Charles Aiosa (President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas DAlessio (Treasurer)
- Charles Aiosa (President)
- Mike Barrera (Assistant Treasurer/Director Parent/Player support)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The philosophy of BHAI is to provide interested athletes' in playing hockey with the opportunity to develop their skills in settings appropriate to their skill level. BHAI provides these opportunities without regard for race, color, creed or gender in order to promote ice hockey as a sport in which one can learn physical skills, sportsmanship/workmanship & teamwork on and off the ice.
What it reported doing in 2023
The Organization (BHAI) was able to register teams in New Jersey Youth Hockey while continuing to keep youth hockey affordable for young boys and girls.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.9%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -68% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -63.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.