Baylor University

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741159753
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Waco, Texas, United States
Phone
1-800-229-5678
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
University or Technological Institute
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,558,351,465
Expenses
$1,503,719,409
Assets
$4,382,957,446
Liabilities
$1,141,821,233

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

58 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEVIN JACKSON (VICE PRESIDENT FOR STUDENT)
  • LINDA LIVINGSTONE (PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY BRICKHOUSE (VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST)

Highest reported compensation

  • SCOTT DREW (HEAD MEN'S BASKETBALL COAC): $6,836,352 total reported compensation
  • DAVE ARANDA (FOOTBALL HEAD COACH): $4,559,637 total reported compensation
  • MACK RHOADES (VP & DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS): $3,600,357 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Baylor University is a private Christian university and a nationally ranked research institution. The University provides a vibrant campus community for more than 20,000 students by blending interdisciplinary research with a global commitment to educational and Christian leadership within a supportive community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Instruction: baylor university stands as one of the premier institutions of higher education in the world.chartered in 1845 by the republic of Texas and affiliated with the baptist general convention oftexas, the university is the oldest continuously operating institution of higher learning in the state of Texas. As part of fulfilling baylor's mission of instructing and educating men and women for worldwide leadership and service, baylor pursues initiatives such as lower student-faculty ratio (15:1), smaller class size (average class size is 27), research opportunities for students, and great facilities for learning and living. (continued on schedule o)baylor's approximately 20,000 students typically come from all 50 states, the district of columbia, and 90 countries around the world. The university offers 133 baccalaureate, 82 master's, 50 doctoral, numerous online graduate professional programs, the education specialist and the juris doctor degree programs through 12 academic units. The university also equips students with both knowledge and experience to pursue god's call to ministry by offering 7 master degrees and 2 doctorate degrees through truett seminary. Additionally, the university conducts graduate programs with the u.s. Army at several u.s. Army locations across the united states. Students find the best of a large university through exceptional breadth and depth of programs along with extraordinary personal attention for the individual student. Baylor students garner competitive scholarships such as fulbright, truman, goldwater, rotary, critical language, and national science foundation graduate fellowships. More than 90% of baylor undergraduate students receive financial assistance. Named every year since 2011 by the chronicle of higher education as a "great college to work for", baylor consistently ranks in the top 100 national doctoral granting universities by u.s. News & world report, as a "best buy" by the fiske guide to colleges, and a "best value" by kiplinger's personal finance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 89
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Pass
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Pass
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.2%; rating input score 81; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.91; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 26 of 32 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.2B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $6.8M · 58 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $197.7M reported
  • Consistency: 52 of 52 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 14 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 159 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 108 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.