Bayla Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871883976
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2025
- Location
- Colorado Spgs, CO, USA
- Phone
- 8503576412
- Rating
- 20
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Small Business Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100
- Expenses
- $775
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Small Business Development
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - The endowment provides a meaningful financial cushion. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 13
- Transparency: NotEnoughData
- Compliance: 50
- Endowment Health: 76
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 12.9%; rating input score 13; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Limited
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: Limited
- Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: 9.22; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Payout: Filed payout detail
- Trustees: Filed trustees detail
- Investments: 76th percentile for endowment coverage
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 13/100.