Bay Sox Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272295343
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- New Bedford, MA, USA
- Phone
- 8552297691
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,965
- Expenses
- $22,976
- Assets
- $112,713
- Liabilities
- $127,720
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICK M O'CONNOR (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- PATRICK M O'CONNOR (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- RITA M HUBNER (DIRECTOR)
- DAVID A TEDHAM (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To: (i)promote, advance, foster and encourage the amateur sport of baseball; (ii) operate an organized amateur baseball team consisting of collegiate athletes and to develop and promote opportunities for amateur athelets and youths in the sport of baseball through instruction, education and training; (iii) benefit and promote other charitable causes through the sport of baseball and (iv) otherwise preserve and promote the sport of baseball to the public at large.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 10
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.3%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.91; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 65.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.