Bay Riders Motorcycle Club San Francisco

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

3 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

A motorcycle club that is self supporting in order to raise money for various charities through event fundraising

Member benefits and services

Revenue model: Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Mission deployment rate: Limited
Program expense ratio: Limited
Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: -13.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: -37% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 45 of 45 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.