Bay Park Community Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341883132
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Toledo, OH, USA
Phone
4192525772
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,423,718
Expenses
$96,589,411
Assets
$55,993,760
Liabilities
$13,736,091

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAWN BUSKEY (PRESIDENT - TTH/CHIEF ACUTE CARE OFFICER)
  • DARRELL WACHOWIAK (TRUSTEE/PRESIDENT - FLOWER HOSPITAL)
  • THAD WADSWORTH (PRESIDENT - BPCH)
  • ARTURO POLIZZI (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ARTURO POLIZZI (CEO): $3,133,332 total reported compensation
  • DAWN BUSKEY (PRESIDENT - TTH/CHIEF ACUTE CARE OFFICER): $1,354,936 total reported compensation
  • TERRENCE METZGER (TREASURER/CFO): $1,215,928 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bay park community hospital is dedicated to premier service, committed to superior quality, and devoted to our patients and families. Our values include: collaboration - working together as a team, internally with employees, physicians, patients, and families, and externally with other community and health-related organizations; community-based - a locally owned community resource, guided by constituent needs; compassion - concern and understanding for others with commitment to help; excellence - superior performance and outcomes; integrity - honesty, sincerity, and accountability; stewardship - sound management or resources for the benefit of the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bay park community hospital (d/b/a promedica bay park hospital) is part of promedica health system, inc. (promedica), a mission-based, locally owned, nonprofit healthcare organization highly focused on achieving core values. Headquartered in toledo, Ohio, promedica serves 28 states across the country and is one of the nation's leading health systems. Our stewardship of resources has enabled us to wisely invest in patient-centered care, advanced technology, innovative programs and family-oriented facilities that help to ensure patients and area residents have equal access to high-quality, safe care in the most appropriate setting, regardless of patients' ability to pay. Promedica bay park hospital (bph) is located east of the maumee river. Founded in 2001, the 276,000-square-foot facility includes a treatment and diagnostic center for general medical/surgical and critical care services, obstetrics, pediatrics, orthopaedic surgery, laboratory and imaging services, cardiopulmonary services, a center for sleep disorders, an outpatient diabetes program, endoscopy center, and a full-service emergency center. In addition to72 private inpatient beds, bph's campus also includes a professional office building for physician offices, a wound care clinic and outpatient rehabilitation. The campus also includes a cancer and infusion center to provide outpatient infusion services, including chemotherapy. The center includes three private exam rooms and six private infusion bays with enough space and seating for families to keep loved one's company during treatments. In 2024, bph received recognition from the joint commission for outpatient joint replacement excellence award, the pulmonary excellence award, and a center of excellence for joint replacements. Newsweek recognized the hospital's labor, delivery, recovery, and postpartum department with a five-ribbon ranking. Bph is one of five hospitals in Ohio to receive this award. The hospital also began functioning as a level iii trauma center with recognition by the american college of surgeons. In 2024, the hospital served 2,614 inpatients and 128,036 outpatients. Additionally, 22,435 people sought care through bph's emergency center in 2024. The hospital contributed $23,031,000 in community benefit through community benefit expenditures, financial assistance and government-sponsored, means-tested health care. Through community health services, health professional education, subsidized health services, research activities, cash and in-kind contributions, and community benefit operations, bph contributed $3,260,000 to the community during 2024. Included in this amount are the following: stroke risk assessments and education at local community events. Provided blood pressure screenings and self-monitoring education at community events, senior centers, and other community-based locations. Continued to offer the hospital's no cost food clinic and meals at discharge initiatives providing food access to patients screening positive for food insecurity. Continued to offer financial coaching to patients screening positive for financial strain. Provided health literacy education pertaining to chronic diseases and crisis intervention with stop the bleed education. Bph employees supported events including the walk to end alzheimer's, the Oregon schools frost fest, the american heart association heart walk, and the susan g. Komen race for the cure. Bph provided a significant amount of financial assistance to the community during 2024, of which $8,399,000 represented uncompensated amounts for treatment to those patients who did not have the financial resources to pay for hospital services. Financial assistance represents the cost to provide service and does not include the costs for accounts written off to bad debt for patients who do not pay their bills. Bph cost of bad debt for 2024 was $6,664,000. This amount is not included in the community benefit amount of $23,031,000 noted above. Further, bph provi

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 29 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 71 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.