Bay Area Peacekeepers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320251246
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Richmond, CA, USA
Phone
5106723477
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Delinquency Prevention

Reported finances

Revenue
$114,379
Expenses
$138,221
Assets
$16,387
Liabilities
$11,966

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GONZALO RUCOBO (PRESIDENT AND EXCUTIVE DIR)
  • ANTOINETTE CLARK (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GONZALO RUCOBO (PRESIDENT AND EXCUTIVE DIR)
  • ANTOINETTE CLARK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARK TORRES (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bay area peacekeepers, inc (bap) seeks to help save lives by bringing hope and change to those that society has discarded and that have been negatively impacted by gangs and neighborhood violence. Bap aims to bring support and advocacy to communities, schools, institutions, and families by being intimately involved with these groups and individuals.

What it reported doing in 2016

Provide support and advocacy to communities, schools, institutions, and families impacted by violence

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -86.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.