Battle Ground Prevention Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923473129
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Battle Ground, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3607987188
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $66,490
- Expenses
- $72,135
- Assets
- $22,328
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jennifer Kirby (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Jennifer Kirby (Executive Director)
- Jessica Cole (Director)
- Kirsten Shelton (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Battle ground prevention alliance works to support their local community coming together to end substance abuse and proote positive healthy decisions. The alliance aims to reduce and prevent youth substance abuse in the battle ground community by building resiliency, strengthening relationships, and providing education for local families and other members of the surrounding community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expanding and supporting the local youth extension of the alliance called the d.r.e.a.m. Team. These youth leaders work to empower their peers in the battle ground school district to live drig-free lives by raising awareness, hosting events, implementing strategic initiatives, educating peers on the importance of making healthy decisions, and providing pro-social opportunities for connection and conversation about drugs, alcohol, and coping with stress or depression. There were 100 students enrolled in the program in the 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 192.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 77.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.