Batavia Bulldog Boosters
Legal name: Batavia Bulldog Boosters Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200934857
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Batavia, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6309378600
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $153,751
- Expenses
- $105,726
- Assets
- $303,453
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL MORMAN (PRESIDENT)
- JOHNATHAN BREMNER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL MORMAN (PRESIDENT)
- ROB KNANISHU (DIRECTOR)
- AARON WOODARD (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Batavia Bulldog Booster Organization, Inc. supports and enhances Batavia High School and Rotolo Middle School student athletes through fundraising and donations to provide funds for equipment, uniforms, and other items beyond the district’s athletic budget. public charity under section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Service which supports and enhances the Batavia High School and Rotolo Middle School student athlete's experience through fundraising and donations from parents, the community, and local business to provide our student athletes and teams with the funds for equipment, uniforms, or other items above and beyond the district's athletic budget. Where does your money go?
What it reported doing in 2024
Stadium sign contribution to batavia school district
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 23.8%; rating input score 24; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.2%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.87; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 18 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 24/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.