Basketball Hoops Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933109631
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Butler, MO, USA
Phone
6604249181
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,983
Expenses
$63,082
Assets
$37,901
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATTHEW BERRY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAKE DELOZIER (MEMBER)
  • JOSH DOLL (MEMBER)
  • NICOLE STANTON (MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At basketball hoops academy, our mission is to provide a safe and supportive environment where children can develop their basketball skills, while also learning important values such as sportsmanship, teamwork, and respect. We believe that basketball is more than just a game, it is an opportunity to build strong relationships and promote a sense of community among young people. By emphasizing the fundamentals of basketball, we aim to help our players reach their full potential, both on and off the court. We strive to create a culture of inclusivity and positivity, where every child feels valued and supported, regardless of their skill level or background. Our ultimate goal is to instill a lifelong love of basketball, and to help our young players become confident and well-rounded individuals who will make a positive impact in their communities. In order to achieve its vision and carry out its mission, basketball hoops academy governs itself in accordance with the following values: posi

What it reported doing in 2025

During the year, basketball hoops academy provided youth basketball instruction and mentorship programs focused on skill development, sportsmanship, teamwork, and personal growth. The organization created a safe and supportive environment where children of varying skill levels participated in practices, drills, and team activities designed to improve basketball fundamentals while building confidence, discipline, and respect for others. Basketball hoops academy emphasized inclusivity and positive community engagement by encouraging cooperation among players, coaches, and families. Through organized training sessions and team-based activities, participants developed leadership skills, strengthened peer relationships, and learned the value of accountability and teamwork both on and off the court. The organization also promoted character development by reinforcing core values such as positivity, respect, and community involvement. Program activities helped participants build self-esteem, establish healthy social connections, and foster a lifelong appreciation for athletics and constructive community participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $58K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.