Bartlett Roundhouse Preservation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262184313
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Bartlett, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6033678637
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,261
- Expenses
- $9,749
- Assets
- $40,750
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT C MALLETT (Vice President)
- CAMERON SARGENT (President)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT C MALLETT (Vice President)
- JAMES ABBOTT (Director)
- SANDRA ABBOTT (Secretary/Treas)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To preserve, protect and restore the 1887 Bartlett Roundhouse, located on the former Maine Central railroad's famed Mountain Division in Bartlett, New Hampshire. Our secondary mission is to preserve, obtain and protect any items of historical relevance pertaining to the Bartlett Roundhouse, railroad history of Bartlett and through the Crawford Notch.
What it reported doing in 2024
The entity's purpose is the educational and historical preservation of the bartlett roundhouse, located on route 302, in bartlett, New Hampshire. The site was the former property for the boston & Maine railroad.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.18; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.