Bartlett Regional Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920147705
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Juneau, AK, USA
Phone
9074635704
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$190,084
Expenses
$204,954
Assets
$2,332,064
Liabilities
$1,762

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • MARIA UCHYTIL (PRIOR EXECUT): $54,792 total reported compensation
  • MELISSA MCCORMICK (EXECUTIVE DI): $4,446 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To carry on educational, literary, scientific and charitable purposes, both directly and by the application of assets to the use of bartlett regional hospital.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promote health education and awareness: when established in 1992, one of the goals of the foundation was to promote medical study, research, and the continuing education of medical and health care professionals and staff located in juneau and its surrounding communities. Through the edelman health sciences scholarship and partnership with other local non-profit organizations (the "grow your own" program"), the foundation is able to promote community education and awareness related to health matters and to promote medical studies in southeast Alaska. During this reporting period, the foundation awarded twelve health sciences scholarships. Through the dr. Bob urata hospice education fund and partnership with the foundation for end of life care, the bartlett regional hospital foundation is able to support healthcare professionals in juneau who seek hospice focused education and training. The goal of bartlett regional hospital's grow your own program is to encourage people to explore careers in healthcare locally. By providing training and internship opportunities we build a pathway for a sustainable healthcare workforce at bartlett regional hospital while reducing the high utilization rate of traveling health care workers. These programs work in conjunction with the bartlett foundation's edelman health sciences scholarship to provide healthcare education, training, and employment opportunities for southeast alaskans.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.38; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $123K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.