Barry Goldwater Institute for Public Policy Research

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860597661
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6024625000
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,677,478
Expenses
$8,162,349
Assets
$44,169,498
Liabilities
$380,949

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VICTOR RICHES (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • VICTOR RICHES (PRESIDENT/CEO): $299,338 total reported compensation
  • TIMOTHY SANDEFUR (VP FOR LITIGATION): $236,004 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINA SANDEFUR (EXECUTIVE VP): $229,598 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through research, investigations, strategic litigation, testimony, advocacy, and education, the goldwater institute advances public policy and a rule of law under which individuals can shape their own destinies as free men and women. We help citizens understand and adopt policies that sustain and restore economic liberty, educational freedom, personal responsibility, and constitutional limits on government power consistent with the founding principles of our constitutional republic. When government oversteps its proper bounds, the goldwater institute uses public interest litigation to enforce individual rights and constraints on government power guaranteed by our state and federal constitutions.

What it reported doing in 2024

Communications: in 2024, the goldwater institute continued to capture national media attention with interviews and news reports about its successful efforts to defend individual liberties. The goldwater institute's media relations efforts are built on a multi-level strategic approach that harnesses the power of its in-house digital platforms, the reach of traditional media, and the virality of social media to reach audiences across the country. The results are seen by countless americans on the pages of the nation's most notable newspapers and most-watched news networks. Goldwater institute experts and clients published 87 op-eds and letters to the editor in 2024, in outlets that included the wall street journal, fox news, national review, the Washington times, the Washington examiner, the hill, USA today, the orange county register, the tennessean, the Arizona republic, and the Arizona capitol times, whose combined online circulation exceeds 180 million readers per month. Our experts were also a regular presence on national cable tv news networks, nationally syndicated radio shows, and local broadcast tv and radio, sharing goldwater's work with an even wider audience. All told, the goldwater institute more than doubled its appearances on national television, appearing 51 times on programs including fox & friends, newsmax saturday agenda, newsnation morning in america, real america's voice special report, sinclair broadcast group's national desk, abc 15 Arizona, telemundo Arizona, wlky-tv in Kentucky, and wilkow! On salem news channel. The goldwater institute garnered more than 6,800 mentions in traditional (print, radio, television, and online) and social media outlets. The goldwater institute does not just rely on outside media outlets to disseminate its message. In 2024, the goldwater institute leveraged the power of social media to engage audiences and communicate its message, including on facebook, linkedin, x, instagram, and youtube. The goldwater institute shared original articles, blog posts, investigative reports, legal and policy research, graphics, and goldwater institute-produced videos on all platforms. The goldwater institute's facebook account received over 600,000 impressions, and its x account surpassed 520,000 impressions. On youtube, the goldwater institute's videos received over 85,000 views in 2024, including videos discussing topics like property rights, free speech, parents' rights, and equality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.41; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $299K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.