Barrow County Family Connection Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201393550
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Winder, GA, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,511
Expenses
$5,521
Assets
$49,888

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Jennifer Newkirk (Board Chair)
  • Michelle Yawn (Board Treasurer)
  • Tina Murphy (Board Vice Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our nonprofit is dedicated to creating a thriving Georgia where every child is healthy educated and successful supported by strong families within vibrant communities. Through monthly collaborative meetings we bring together nonprofits and local leaders to enhance coordination and support for individuals in need. Each year we analyze data to pinpoint gaps in services and barriers to access within our county. Our approach includes three strategy teams composed of engaged community members who work together to address these challenges providing practical assistance and fostering collaboration to drive positive change.

What it reported doing in 2024

Monthly collaborative meetings were instrumental in laying the groundwork for advancing the mission of Family Connection. Through analysis of our data it became evident that our primary areas of focus should center around housing mental health and early learning and care. To effectively address these key areas we established three strategy teams. Within the Early Learning and Care team we further divided efforts into three subcommittees: Birth to 5 Literacy School-Aged Literacy and Childcare Access Solutions. These strategic divisions allowed us to target specific needs within the community and tailor our initiatives accordingly.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.5%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 89.5%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.04; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.