Barrington Elementary PTA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020483313
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2015
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Barrington, NH, United States
- Phone
- 603-664-2641
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,965
- Expenses
- $1,878
- Assets
- $15,674
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Katie Hatfield (President)
- Bianca Leonard (Vice President)
- Jill Hillfiker (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Valerie Correia (Treasurer)
- Katie Hatfield (President)
- Bianca Leonard (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
_BES is an elementary school situated in Southeastern New Hampshire with a population of about 400 students in grades 1-4. BES has a dynamic, dedicated, professional staff of 45 and a qualified, equally dedicated support staff of 35. In addition to the classroom teaching staff, these numbers include five Special Education case managers, two school counselors, one reading specialist, one full time nurse, REACH teacher, a school psychologist, a speech therapist, occupational therapist, principal and an assistant principal. In addition, BES often hosts teacher interns from a variety of universities and colleges across the state. Our class sizes range from mid-teens to low twenties. BES has an i.
What it reported doing in 2015
During the year, the organization was able to promote the welfare of children and bring closer relation of the home and school along with the parents and teachers, through the multiple activities paid for and organized by the organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.35; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -78.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -54.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.