Barnes-jewish St Peters & Progress West Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454471497
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Saint Peters, MO, USA
Phone
6369169796
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$325,029
Expenses
$587,871
Assets
$1,091,389
Liabilities
$35,856

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATTERSON GREGORY (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT BEG 7/24)
  • CALDER GINA (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT TERM 4/24)

Highest reported compensation

  • WATTS CHRISTOPHER (FORMER DIR/PRES TERM 12/20): $1,268,008 total reported compensation
  • PATTERSON GREGORY (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT BEG 7/24): $646,379 total reported compensation
  • ZIA NADIA MD (DIRECTOR): $643,146 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the health, healing, and hope of our community. This is done through work and support of our care teams at barnes-jewish st. Peters, progress west hospital, siteman cancer center - st. Peters and in partnership with community organziations to (see schedule o) improve the overall health and wellbeing of st. Charles county.

What it reported doing in 2024

Patient support -the barnes-jewish st. Peters and progress west foundation provided support for our patients in various ways. The foundation was excited to bring music therapy back to both of our hospitals by supporting a full-time music therapist for inpatient support. Additionally, the foundation provided healing therapies like horticulture, yoga and massage for patients at both hospitals and our siteman cancer center-st. Peters. Comfort care items were provided, such as: pillows, scarves, head wraps, headphones, phone chargers, fidgets and more. Transportation to and from medical visits for patients in need; bereavement support; car seats, formula and more for new families; highly expensive medical devices such as life vests for those at risk of sudden cardiac failure; mouth and jaw (see schedule o) protectors for throat and mouth cancer treatments; specialized skin cream for patients undergoing radiation treatments; welcome activity kits for infusion center outpatients; sleep hygiene kits for inpatients having issues getting proper rest during their stay.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 89
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.5%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 20
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -80.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.5% of revenue deployed · 20.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 38 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.