Barefoot University
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861386044
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Haslet, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5803821943
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $698,222
- Expenses
- $602,268
- Assets
- $642,232
- Liabilities
- $3,681
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MADELEINE BRADEN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- AMBER BROWN (VICE-PRESIDE): $41,748 total reported compensation
- MADELEINE BRADEN (PRESIDENT): $38,780 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Barefoot university connects families to nature and each other. Our forest schools nourish the holistic health & education of children. Through child led learning, engaging stem & science based activities, community service projects, creating communities, & equipping families to observe & explore our natural world, barefooters thrive.
What it reported doing in 2025
Barefoot university is an outdoor meeting cooperative group, primarily for kindergarten through high school-aged children. Barefoot university promotes the health and education of each child through weekly focuses and creates communities for homeschool families. The primary goal of barefoot university is to assist children in nurturing a love of outdoor learning. Through this, they will develop valuable skills that facilitate a self-driven knowledge of the natural world. Barefoot university groups meet once per week, outside, to conduct a nature, steam, or forest school themed activity. Barefoot university also includes enrichment field trips and community service projects. In the past, our activities have consisted of a variety of subjects including but not limited to; microscopic algae study, whittling, tree circumference and ring counting, wildflower study, native grass identification, raft and nature boat building, water flow ecology study, mushroom spore prints, geology and fossil study. Along with the activities listed above fine arts and music are also included but not limited; pottery out of native clay, musical instruments made from natural materials, cairns and rock art, rain and watercolor paintings, and grass whistles. Activities are facilitated by a volunteer leaders at each location and parents assist the children in accomplishing the activities. Each barefoot university branch is held at a park or outdoor space that is local to that specific branch. Barefoot university events can take anywhere from 2-4 hours depending on the specific activity that day. As we expand, our branches will be able to add or subtract the time needed for each activity based on their specific needs. Each activity is funded by family membership to barefoot university and donations. Ninety percent of our overall expenses are allocated to the activities done by children. This is in the form of supplies for each activity. In the future, barefoot university would like to expand it's reach and audience into after school programs for low income, inner-city youth. By spending time outdoors and fostering a love of nature, studies have shown greatly reduced anxiety and increased communication skills and focus in children. Barefoot university is striving to provide all children with the opportunity to access nature in a safe and sustainable way.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 53.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.4% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $499K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.