Bardo La

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471498683
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3109023027
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,530
Expenses
$232,269
Assets
$33,751
Liabilities
$255,600

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETA BETINSKI (President)
  • YANN PERREAU (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETA BETINSKI (President)
  • YANN PERREAU (Vice President)
  • RACHEL REID WILKE (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purposes for which this corporation is organized are to foster international exchange of arts and culture via traveling exhibitions and events; and to curate art exhibitions in the public shere both nationally and internationally.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bardola produced and curated the first ever group exhibition of 20 los angeles artists that premiered at the most esteemed international art happening, la biennale di venezia 2015. The exhibition showcased art of 20 los angeles artists from may through november 2015 in the city of venezia, italy. Bardola collaborated with one of the most respected art education institutions in the world, the accademia di belle arti venezia, and engaged the accademia's students in mounting the exhibition, thus contributing greatly to international exchange and art education.in october 2015 bardola produced and curated a one-woman exhibition at the ontario international airport in ontario, ca. The exhibition presented the work of los angeles based artist brandy eve allen in the public spaces of the ontario airport.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.9%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 41%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -43.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.57; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.9% of revenue deployed · 41% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.