Barathaven Master Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204902753
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Ofallon, MO, USA
Phone
6365619300
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,627
Expenses
$59,301
Assets
$14,986
Liabilities
$14,562

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ED ETZKORN (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER P MCKEE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ED ETZKORN (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER P MCKEE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GLENN G MITCHELL (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Barathaven maintains a 300 acre residential and commercial community that embraces tranquility and peace. It is home to an alzheimer's special care center, a beautiful lake, and numerous walking paths that give public access to many amenities as well as local colleges.

What it reported doing in 2020

Barathaven maintains the beautiful lake, landscaping, monuments, and numerous walking paths of a 300 acre residential and commercial community that grants public access to local amenities and colleges. It is also home to an alzheimer's special care center that offers specialized care for residents with alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 97.3%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 97.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.