Baptist Women in Ministry North Carolina

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582053394
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
Phone
9196371352
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,652
Expenses
$151,287
Assets
$215,357
Liabilities
$167,612

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lynette Sills (Interim Executive Director)
  • Ka'thy Gore Chappell (Executive Director)
  • Leslie Park (Executive Director - New)

People named in this filing

  • Lynette Sills (Interim Executive Director)
  • Ka'thy Gore Chappell (Executive Director)
  • Leslie Park (Executive Director - New)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide support to Baptist Women.

What it reported doing in 2025

Hot Topics - Preaching in a Polarized World overnight retreat with seven ministers. Dialogical Preaching Practicum sessions with twelve ministers led by two coaches.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 17
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.3%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 18

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.78; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 61.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 58.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 59.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.3% of revenue deployed · 18.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.