Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581521475
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9012277014
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $397,014,555
- Expenses
- $425,208,064
- Assets
- $1,863,454,830
- Liabilities
- $787,214,189
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
72 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON M LITTLE (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- BOBBIE K WARE (CEO MS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER)
- JUSTIN RHODES (VP-CEO BMG & CONNECTED CARE)
- TIMOTHY HAMPTON HOPKINS (VP/COLLEGE PRESIDENT)
- ANNA K BISHOP (CEO-BOONEVILLE/UNION COUNTY)
- BRIAN K HOGAN (CEO BMH-DESOTO)
Highest reported compensation
- JASON M LITTLE (PRESIDENT & CEO): $3,913,950 total reported compensation
- ZACHARY R CHANDLER (EVP/CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER): $1,830,299 total reported compensation
- GREGORY M DUCKETT (EVP, CHIEF LEGAL OFF. & SEC.): $1,760,131 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In keeping with the three-fold ministry of christ, healing, preaching and teaching, baptist memorial health care corporation is committed to providing quality health care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Baptist memorial health care corporation is the sole member of a number of hospitals and physician practices in west Tennessee, north and central Mississippi, and east Arkansas. In addition, baptist memorial health care corporation supplies management, consulting, and support services to those entities through its corporate staff. Management services are provided to these related organizations which provide quality health care regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, or age. The support includes legal, financial, quality, and personnel services.by providing these services on a centralized and coordinated basis, the affiliated organizations are run efficiently and effectively, the quality of service is higher and more cost effective, and the data generated is more meaningful. These efficiencies greatly contribute to the exempt purpose of the related organizations, allowing them to accomplish their charitable purposes, and better utilize their resources where they are needed most, providing better care for the community.in july 2012, baptist memorial health care corporation signed a contract with epic, a software vendor based out of verona, Wisconsin, paving the way for baptist memorial health care corporation's transition to a new electronic health record (ehr). The project involved all baptist-affiliated hospitals along with its clinics and financial systems. All 13,000-plus baptist employees and more than 3,000 affiliated physicians were affected by the project.baptist memorial health care corporation chose epic after conducting a great deal of research and involving colleagues in numerous demonstrations, which more than 2,500 attended. Baptist memorial health care corporation took colleagues' feedback into deep consideration before making a decision. Baptist memorial health care corporation colleagues played a role in branding the epic-powered software as "baptist onecare"."baptist onecare creates a single patient record that both caregivers and patients are able to access. The ehr aims to maximize efficiency by reducing the need for duplicate tests and patients having to give the same information to multiple caregivers. Patient privacy is protected the same way it is with a written record.the biggest convenience for patients within the system is called mychart, a free application accessible via smartphone or computer that allows patients to schedule appointments, refill prescriptions, direct message their care providers with the option of including photos, access lab results, and much more.baptist memorial health care corporation and vanderbilt university medical center began an academic affiliation in october 2012. This academic affiliation provides for new clinical research and academic education opportunities that are designed to enhance cancer programs.the affiliation establishes a framework for collaborative oncology initiatives between baptist cancer center and vanderbilt-ingram cancer center. Baptist cancer center patients have increased access to vanderbilt-ingram cancer center clinical research trials and genetic diagnostic tools. Many of these services are available in local communities throughout baptist's 24 hospitals in west Tennessee, north and central Mississippi, and east Arkansas.baptist memorial health care corporation emphasizes customer service. Customer service is a key part of baptist memorial health care corporation's culture. Called "service first", baptist memorial health care corporation and its affiliated entities throughout the mid-south are finding better ways to serve our customers and exceed their expectations.baptist memorial health care corporation's commitment to care beyond the walls of the hospitals is sincere and long standing. Our giving is focused on two primary areas, health care delivery and preventive services and education. We are dedicated to building a healthy community by anticipating and responding to our communities' health needs, improving the well-being of
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 73.3%; rating input score 73; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.38; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $410.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.9M · 72 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $99.1M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 87 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 102 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.