Bank Depository User Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311140217
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Madison, WI, USA
Phone
6084691680
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,532
Expenses
$7,722
Assets
$56,401
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Rick Beaver (Chairperson)
  • Yasha Shetty (Vice Chairperson)
  • Nilakshi Pradhan (Industry Liaison)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase the information flow between DTCC bank participants and DTCC: provide DTCC's management with input from the membership it relates to their policies, procedures, and operations; and to promote a spirit of cooperation and goodwill among the members of DTCC. Providing members the conduit and means to share information and develop ideas.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization was able to increase the information flow between DTCC bank participants and DTCC: provide DTCC's management with input from the membership it relates to their policies, procedures, and operations; and to promote a spirit of cooperation and goodwill among the members of DTCC. Did this thru virtual meetings, conference calls and shared groupsite.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.3; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.