Bananas Foster Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922628707
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Savannah, GA, USA
- Phone
- 9127122482
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $273,242
- Expenses
- $179,614
- Assets
- $187,740
- Liabilities
- $4,804
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOLIE CHABALA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOLIE CHABALA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $60,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is celebrating the foster care community while educating and inspiring others to get involved.
What it reported doing in 2024
Potassium care baskets - because we only celebrate one family/individual per game, we know there are thousands of families we can't share their stories. It's commonly referred that 50% of foster parents will quit after their first year due to a lack of support. With the potassium care basket program, we want to support everyone in the foster care community. If we know there is a family in need, we want to help support them in their journey, so we send them a care basket. In 2024, we sent 75 potassium care baskets to support those in the foster care community. These baskets were personalized to the needs of the family. For example, a family that just welcomed a teenager into their home and needs some support - they would get a basket that has essential items for the teen but also crafts, games, and activities that are age appropriate and help make the transition of a new home more bearable. The potassium care baskets also go to newly licensed foster families, to provide support right from the start of their journey. Bananas foster works directly with licensing agencies to send baskets to families when they get licensed as a welcome to the community that makes a difference. Our long-term goal for this program is to be the first call/email/letter when families need something in their foster care journey. Many families will say no to a child because of the lack of support or need for specific items, we want this program to eliminate any no, and give families the confidence to say yes to a child in need because bananas foster will be there to support them. We hope that in the future every foster/bio/kinship family that comes into contact with bananas foster will be given a potassium care basket to feel supported.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.3%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 59.8%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 83.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 71.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.3% of revenue deployed · 59.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 1 filing year from 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.