Baltimore County Horse Show Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522269360
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Owings Mills, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4104047663
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Equestrian
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,313
- Expenses
- $71,321
- Assets
- $21,994
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATE HINDMAN (PRESIDENT)
- EMMA SUAREZ-MURIAS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KATE HINDMAN (PRESIDENT)
- IRENE GLADYS (VICE PRESIDE)
- TAMARA BARNES (SECRETARY/TR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to offer affordable, competitive and educational opportunities to equestrians of all ages while fostering a strong sense of connection within an inclusive equestrian community in baltimore county and the surrounding areas.
What it reported doing in 2024
The baltimore county horse show association (bchsa) serves an average of 250 members and 150 horses annually, offering over 15 competitive shows per season for riders of all ages and skill sets. Riders compete to qualify for medal finals and attend the annual year-end awards banquet.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.