Ballet for All Kids
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263849583
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Encino, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8055245503
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $192,502
- Expenses
- $141,129
- Assets
- $52,960
- Liabilities
- $188,200
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BONNIE SCHLACHTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ADRIENNE CRANE-ROSS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BONNIE SCHLACHTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ADRIENNE CRANE-ROSS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- CRYSTAL JONELIS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ballet for all kids was formed to provide any child - no matter their abilities or disabilities - with the access to a formal, classical ballet education. Ballet for all kids gives children, especially those with special needs, the opportunity to participate fully in all the benefits that ballet has to offer. Children with special needs are afforded the chance to learn the self-discipline, increased self worth and sense of accomplishment through this program. Children are fully integrated into the world of ballet and the art of ballet.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ballet for all kids teaches classical ballet and other dance styles using the schlachte method - a certified curriculum developed to accommodate all abilities, body types, and learning styles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.8%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.55; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.8% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.