Ballerz Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871449522
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Garland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4694714798
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Basketball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,262
- Expenses
- $4,600
- Assets
- $4,505
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Camilo valencia (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Camilo valencia (CEO)
- Humberto Valencia (Board Secretary)
- Daniel Valencia (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific and primary purposes for which this corporation is formed are to promote and encourage all kinds of field and athletic sports; to promote and encourage the sport, pleasure, exercise, and recreation of its members; to establish and maintain an athletic club to provide for the enjoyment, entertainment, and physical improvement and fitness of its members; to promote sociability and friendship among its members; and to manage and conduct entertainments, excursions, and social meetings for the betterment of its members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Donations for other non-profits
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 19.2%; rating input score 19
- Program expense ratio: 26.1%; rating input score 26
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 58.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 19.2% of revenue deployed · 26.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.