Ballad Health Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581594191
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Johnson City, TN, USA
Phone
4233023131
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,053,890
Expenses
$7,314,051
Assets
$64,955,620
Liabilities
$7,004,606

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACK SIMPSON (PRESIDENT/EX-OFFICO)

Highest reported compensation

  • LYNN KRUTAK (FORMER TRUSTEE / BH EVP & CFO): $1,177,446 total reported compensation
  • ANTHONY KECK (TRUSTEE): $1,106,839 total reported compensation
  • TODD NORRIS (TRUSTEE): $756,023 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ballad health foundation's primary purpose is to build relationships with others to fulfill the mission and vision of ballad health through philanthropy. Working together around a common set of objectives, we can transform our community's health and well-being.

What it reported doing in 2024

Ballad health foundation builds relationships that fulfill the mission and vision of ballad health through philanthropy. During the fiscal year ending june 30, 2025, over 4,535 community minded businesses and individuals made gifts that enabled the foundation to leverage the power of philanthropy to improve the overall health of the appalachian highlands. These gifts enabled the foundation to provide $5,532,407 in grants for equipment, programs, and services throughout the region.over $3.3 million was designated for niswonger children's hospital and pediatric services to include funding for a two floor addition to the hospital, expansion of the pediatric infusion center and pediatric outpatient rehab center, and for items such as pediatric eye surgery stretchers, air transport isolette, nicu beds, wheelchairs, stretchers, pediatric ultrasound and fetal monitor, music therapy for pediatric oncology patients and program support for our children's resource center.the foundation also provided $2.2 million in grants for equipment, program needs, and education throughout other ballad facilities. This included $384,336 for cardiology equipment, $148,105 for oncology needs, $201,202 for renovation of a hospitality house for cancer patients, and $31,028 for hospice/home health care. We saw significant increases in our patient assistance program and team member emergency support due to hurricane helene. The foundation provided over $400,000 in patient assistance funds and over $545,000 for team member emergency support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $37.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.88; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 44 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.