Baldwin Whitehall Aquatics
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450713612
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4124635982
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,536
- Expenses
- $82,060
- Assets
- $73,340
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER STAHL (PRESIDENT)
- JAMIE MODER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER STAHL (PRESIDENT)
- JAMIE MODER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELE WASHOWICH (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Baldwin Whitehall Aquatics seeks to provide a structured, competitive swim program to the youth of the community. We also will serve as a direct age-group feeder program to the Middle School and High School programs. We will provide quality instruction to swimmers of all ages and ability levels in a positive, open environment. It is our goal to foster character development and promote a life-long love for the sport.
What it reported doing in 2017
The baldwin whitehall aquatics enrolled 90 swimmers into the program for 2017. Swimmers were taught swimming techniques, participated in team building skills and learned the fundamentals of team competition
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $84K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.