Bal Swan Demonstration School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934460153
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Broomfield, CO, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Charter Schools

Reported finances

Revenue
$157,383
Expenses
$22,697
Assets
$141,561

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Heather Matthews (President)
  • Rebecca Hubbard (President)

People named in this filing

  • Heather Matthews (President)
  • Rebecca Hubbard (President)
  • Lynne Whitney (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A school where students can investigate, collaborate, and thrive. We are a place of radical acceptance of the things that make us unique, and we want students to feel essential to their learning community. Grove is meant to be a special place where students and families feel welcome, connected, cared about, and known.

What it reported doing in 2024

Grove is a multi-sensory, multimodal workshop approach to inclusive education. Groves responsive model prioritizes the importance of social and emotional learning and highlights the benefits of engaging students through various sensesvisual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, olfactory, and gustatoryto create a rich and accessible learning experience for every student. At Grove, we design learning to include a combination of different sensory inputs and methods to enhance the student learning process. Our approach goes beyond traditional methods to create an enriching, engaging experience that caters to a broader range of learning styles and needs, with a focus on those with multiple learning needs, sensitivities, and abilities. The educators at Grove Elementary intentionally design learning to be accessible for all through Universal Design principles, so students can self-advocate, investigate, collaborate, and THRIVE!

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 85.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.24; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.