Bakhita Mountain Home Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831951199
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Colorado Springs, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7195081513
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $231,356
- Expenses
- $295,989
- Assets
- $286,531
- Liabilities
- $8,426
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jason Frazier (Executive Director)
- Creed Spillane (President)
- Jay Sherwood (Vice-President)
Highest reported compensation
- Jason Frazier (Executive Director): $129,826 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support women in healing from the trauma of sexual exploitation and in achieving independence by providing an established residential home, trauma informed practices, and life enhancing skills.
What it reported doing in 2025
Bakhita Mountain Home assists women transitioning from human trafficking to self sufficiency and successful reintegration into society. Women experience healing through three components safe haven, trauma informed therapy and life enhancing skills. Bakhita Mountain Home is a rent free residential community where love heals, restores and empowers women impacted by human trafficking. It is a two year residential program for women ages 18 and older who have been trafficked for sex or labor. The home provides safe and sufficient space for privacy, community building, therapy exercise, cooking, dining and gardening. It enables leisure activities, reflection and communing with nature. It provides the basic needs for the women, including food, clothing, transportation and access to medical, dental and vision care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.3%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 63.3%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.3% of revenue deployed · 63.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $187K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 44 of 44 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.