Bakersfield Aquatics Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263244132
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Bakersfield, CA, USA
Phone
6616319785
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,526
Expenses
$111,553
Assets
$39,018

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK HAVERSTOCK (President)
  • JON MALAMMA (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • MARK HAVERSTOCK (President)
  • JON MALAMMA (Vice President)
  • ROB DORSETT (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bakersfield aquatics club, inc. Has a mission to make competitive swimming accessible to as many members of the community as possible, regardless of socio-economic position, and provide a team of coaches and volunteers that dedicates itself to helping each swimmer exceed their potential in athletics and in life.

What it reported doing in 2020

Bakersfield aquatics club, inc. Has a mission to make competitive swimming accessable to as many members of the community as possible, regardles of socio-economic position and provide a team of coaches and volunteers that dedicates itself to help each swimmer exceed their potential in swimming and in life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.9%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 32.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.9% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.