Bailey's Crossroads Health Access Partne
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300765570
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Falls Church, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7032608429
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,923,770
- Expenses
- $1,147,775
- Assets
- $1,005,584
- Liabilities
- $130,789
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNETTE SAPPE-WATKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- PHILIP ELIOT (PRESIDENT)
- CYNDA TIPPLE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LYNETTE SAPPE-WATKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $140,449 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The clinic provides high quality, culturally appropriate health services to the uninsured individuals in low-income communities in northern Virginia. The clinic provides vital services, vital navigation and vital education to achieve improved health outcomes for the bailey's crossroads community of fairfax county, Virginia.
What it reported doing in 2024
Primary medical care - culmore clinic provides high quality primary medical care and specialty referrals to low-income uninsured individuals in the bailey's crossroads/culmore community in Virginia at little to no cost. Culmore clinic services include primary medicare care and chronic disease management, influenza vaccinations, preventive screenings (cervical, breast, colon, prostate cancer, osteoporosis), HIV and std testing, referrals for specialist and diagnostic testing, access to reduced price medications, education and self-management to improve health outcomes, patient care services/case management and a six week educational population health management program for diabetes patients to address the social determinants of health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.1%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $55.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 70.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.1% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $808K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.