Back To Blue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954362535
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2011
- Location
- Valencia, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6612541864
- Rating
- 25
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2
- Expenses
- $115,981
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - A large share of spending goes to grants. The filing does not identify all grant recipients and the available information about grant readiness state registration leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 75
- Transparency: 0
- Compliance: 50
- Endowment Health: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 75.4%; rating input score 75; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: Limited
- Filing consistency checks: 4; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Investments: Filed investments detail
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.