Back on Track Long Term Disaster Recovery

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320210723
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Aberdeen, SD, USA
Phone
6052291500
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Search and Rescue Squads

Reported finances

Revenue
$305
Expenses
$213
Assets
$19,022

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Minister to unmet needs in Northeastern SD due to disasters.

What it reported doing in 2011

There were no severe disasters during this fiscal year in which we were called upon to meet unmet needs. There was one remaining program need from the 2007 flood disaster. Although there continues to be flooding in the area, needs have been handled by first responders, volunteers, and emergency programs. Also, the board continued to work on a COAD plan and connected people with programs to help with recent flood damage.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 89.31; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -112.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.