Back Creek Conservancy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473302851
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Annapolis, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4104438270
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $14,962
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANNE BROWN (DIRECTOR)
- FREDRICK R KISSEL (DIRECTOR)
- BETSY LOVE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The back creek conservancy improves, conserves, and speaks for annapolis md's back creek, an estuary of the chesapeake bay, and its watershed, to make it a healthier place to live, work, and play in harmony with nature. By 2025, the back creek conservancy envisions a creek we can swim in without fear of illness; a thriviing creek with fish, crabs, aquatic vegetation, and other wildlife; a creek where neighbors, marine professionals, and recreational boaters work together for improved water quality; a creek that is resilient to the impacts of climate change; and a creek that makes us proud to be a part of america's sailing capital. During 2019, the back creek conservancy merged with another organization with similar missions to join forces in making the watersheds of the chesapeake bay a healthier place to live, work and play in harmony with nature.
What it reported doing in 2019
Back creek watershed action plan - to make back creek an healthier place to live, work and play in harmony with nature.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -46.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -52.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.