Bac Administrative District Council of Eastern Missouri
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271608147
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fenton, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3146215560
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,127,733
- Expenses
- $2,852,187
- Assets
- $8,496,400
- Liabilities
- $1,065,798
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIMOTHY KAIKKONEN (PRESIDENT LOCAL # 1)
- MICHAEL WEBER (PRESIDENT LOCAL # 18)
Highest reported compensation
- BRIAN JENNEWEIN (DIRECTOR): $227,205 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL FOX (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $194,086 total reported compensation
- TERRY DANIEL (FIELD REPRESENTATIVE): $177,546 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose and objectives of this local union include: to unite as far as practicable all of the journeyman bricklayers of this area in this body for the purpose of securing concert of action in whatever may be regarded as conducive to their interests. To improve the wages, hours and working conditions of its members; to increase their job security, advance their economic, social, and cultural interests and to defend their civil rights and liberties. To disseminate information regarding economic, social, political and other matters effecting the lives and welfare of the workers. To advance the interests of members by advocating and endeavoring to secure the enactment of laws beneficial to them, and advocating and endeavoring to obtain the defeat or repeal of laws detrimental to them. To give assistance and encouragement to other labor organizations. To aid charitable, educational, and political organizations and institutions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.98; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 18 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.