Aztalan Cycle Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391400071
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Butler, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9205688652
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $217,895
- Expenses
- $179,871
- Assets
- $508,121
- Liabilities
- $2,845
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE ZIMMERMAN (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN MCCANNA (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JIM BECKMAN (BOARD MEMBER)
- MIKE ZIMMERMAN (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN MCCANNA (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the sport of motocross & short track racing.
What it reported doing in 2020
To promote the sport of motocross & short track, aztalan produces a monthly member newsletter and promotes family memberships to achieve a close knit family atmosphere. People of all ages, male and female, ride at the track. Races are held every 2nd sunday from april to october. There are approximately 5-6 short track events at aztalan's track from may through september.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.82; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.