Azar Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452670332
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8886015580
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $193,335
- Expenses
- $152,113
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Charlotte Allen (CEO)
- Larry Rettig (board president)
- Ollie Adams (Vice President & CFO)
People named in this filing
- Charlotte Allen (CEO)
- Larry Rettig (board president)
- Kimberley Hunter (Secreatary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Azar foundation's mission is to meet the needs of youth (especially those in economically disadvantaged, high risk environments) to bring about a positive change while supporting families, by focusing on hunger relief, educational excellence, health, community service, missions, and economic empowerment.
What it reported doing in 2021
AZAR provides homeless children, at-risk youth, and families: food, education and health, wellness, and nutrition programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.1%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 67.5%; rating input score 67
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.1% of revenue deployed · 67.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I net assets reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.