Az Revolution Soccer Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811575124
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6232299804
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $328,227
- Expenses
- $196,775
- Assets
- $192,426
- Liabilities
- $16,830
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sean Riley (President)
- Ronald Waters (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Sean Riley (President)
- Ronald Waters (Vice President)
- Sean Flanagan (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Arizona Revolution Soccer Club believes youth who take part in sports learn essential life skills that provide the fundamental tools they need to become successful adults. Attention is on the long term development of the athlete by building on the individual's tactical, technical, physical, psycho social, and verbal skills through a fun and passionate atmosphere. We strive to develop players capable of competing at the highest level of competitive youth soccer.
What it reported doing in 2016
220 children from approximately 160 families participate in a variety of youth soccer programs. Competitive soccer participation is an opportunity for youth players to compete with and against similarly gifted athletes, experiences that can define character and teach players life lessons. As serious as soccer is for many of us (coaches, parents and players), an important outcome of participation in Arizona Revolution Soccer Club is well grounded, positive and confident young athletes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 57
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35.1%; rating input score 35
- Program expense ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 35.1% of revenue deployed · 58.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.