Awakeningsusa Org

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460897370
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
Phone
8175289117
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Interfaith Coalitions
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$208,734
Expenses
$259,442
Assets
$191,730
Liabilities
$9,852

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LEWIS HOGAN (PRESIDENT/DI)

Highest reported compensation

  • LEWIS HOGAN (PRESIDENT/DI): $100,988 total reported compensation
  • RACHEL HOGAN (SECRETARY/DI): $40,518 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Calling pastors and christian leaders to unify across denominational, racial and generational lines to take responsibility for the spiritual condition of america through unified repentance, revival prayer and engaging culture for awakening.

What it reported doing in 2024

Since the launching of united cry in 2012, we have remained committed to our mandates: partnering with pastors and the local church to protect life, fostering day-and-nightprayer, and interceding for revival and awakening. In 2024, we continued to build a canopy of prayer across north Texas. We divided the region into 12 zonesstretching north to sherman, east to rockwall, south to cleburne, and west to weatherford appointing pastors and prayer leaders in each zone to cultivate a relational network and expand prayer throughout the area. Additionally, we hosted quarterly united cry prays gatherings and luncheons, bringing together pastors and prayer leaders from across the metroplex to pray and connect. Beyond these efforts, we partnered with local pastors and ministries to host five regional prayer gatherings inrockwall, el paso, jasper, lufkin, and lubbockuniting churches and intercessors to pray for their cities. Each week, we connect pastors throughout the metroplex to a prayer gathering at a house of prayer in arlington. We also provide resources and tools to help church leaders establish corporate altars of prayer within their congregations. In may 2024, united cry welcomed a prayer team from south korea and partnered with local churches to intercede for revival and awakening in americas pulpits. Our life ministry, zoe 2.0, continues to work alongside otherorganizations to support new moms who have little or no assistance. This ministry creates a network of women who offer practical helpsuch as providing meals, assisting with light chores, and offering transportation during the first six weeks of motherhood. Through the support of local churches, these women receive care, guidance, and encouragement. We remain committed to establishing zoe 2.0 within more churches to expand this vital outreach. We continue to witness prayer breaking up the ground, preparing the way for revival and a great harvest in this region. We are deeply grateful for the lords goodness and faithfulness to united cry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 67
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $41.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $189K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.