Avon Lake Historical Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 346623511
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Avon Lake, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4405494425
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $151,024
- Expenses
- $28,098
- Assets
- $202,532
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TONY TOMANEK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TONY TOMANEK (PRESIDENT)
- CHUCK FYE (VICE PRESIDE)
- SANDI GERHAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preservation and education of the history for the citizens of avon lake, Ohio.
What it reported doing in 2024
Interior and exterior improvements which are not limited to window replacement, front and rear porch restoration, hvac upgrades, parapet restoration, and restoration of the second floor interior rooms. This project supports culture through the presentation of features of historic interest in local historical facilities known as the folger home and the peter miller house which are well know city landmarks. The completed facilities are used for cultural programs, musical and drama performances and classes and lectures regarding local history as well as maintaining local historical artifacts for public viewing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.7%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 81.4%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.21; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.7% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.