Avenya Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811203140
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- San Anselmo, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4154652603
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,793
- Expenses
- $868
- Assets
- $20,596
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Andrej Loncar (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Andrej Loncar (Executive Director)
- April Phillips (Treasurer)
- Maja Loncar (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose of Avenya is to provide people with possibilities in learning how to experience the Earth's spiritual world, the source of life, and their own soul. Avenya is working on a film about our sacred relationship with the Earth, the spiritual world that connects us and our reconnection to the source of life and to our own souls. Monthly group meditations were held during the year in which we assisted people in re-connecting to their own souls, the spiritual dimension of our planet, and the source of life. Through this, we are building the foundations for a culture of peace to grow from this sacred connection.
What it reported doing in 2025
Monthly group meditations were held during the year in which we assisted people in re-connecting to their own souls, the spiritual dimension of our planet, and the source of life. Through this, we are building the foundations for a culture of peace to grow from this sacred connection.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.73; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.