Avenue D Boys Choir Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900156354
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Fort Pierce, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7723426147
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Singing, Choral
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $181,106
- Expenses
- $164,230
- Assets
- $62,150
- Liabilities
- $3,204
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EARL HENDRICKS (PRESIDENT)
- MARY HENDRICKS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY HENDRICKS (VICE PRESIDENT): $29,613 total reported compensation
- EARL HENDRICKS (PRESIDENT): $11,845 total reported compensation
- FRANCES SCOTT (OFFICER): $11,125 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Establish a choir from underprivileged
What it reported doing in 2013
The choir made up of 50-100 boys. The boys have received lessons in singing, aid in prevention from dropping out of school and assistance with homework assignments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 25
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.