Aveni Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830731767
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Santa Monica, CA, USA
Phone
8187263278
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$192,406
Expenses
$505,722
Assets
$520,956
Liabilities
$382

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERLINDA GORDON (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • REBECCA REED (QUALITY CONTROL): $108,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Aveni Foundation is committed to expediting development of gene-targeted therapies for cancer and other unmet medical needs.

What it reported doing in 2025

THE AVENI FOUNDATION REPORTED THE PERFORMANCE OF TWO CLINICAL STUDIES:1. Compassionate Use of Intravenous DNG64-CAR-V Tumor-Targeted Retrovector Bearing a Cytocidal Dominant Negative Cyclin G1 Inhibitor for Advanced Sarcoma, Pancreatic Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Ovarian Carcinoma (Single Use INDs)2. Blessed: Expanded Access for DNG64-CAR-V for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer, Sarcoma and Carcinoma of Breast for an Intermediate Size Population (NCT04091295)Thirty-two patients were enrolled, 18 sarcoma, 5 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 1 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 breast carcinoma, 1 prostate cancer, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, 1 basal cell carcinoma, 1 ovarian cancer, and 1 glioblastoma. Sixteen patients were enrolled in Study 1 single patient IND, 16 patients were enrolled in Study 2. Three patients were initially enrolled in Study 2 and later enrolled in Study 1. Twenty-seven of 32 enrolled patients were treated with DNG64-CAR-V either as monotherapy or in combination with FDA approved cancer therapies. Four of the 27 patients treated with DNG64-CAR-V and FDA approved drugs were also treated with either SNK01 autologous enhanced NK cell therapy or SNK02 allogeneic enhanced NK cell therapy.Nine of 15 (60%) patients treated with DNG64-CAR-V + FDA approved drugs are alive 1-71 months from treatment initiation, 2 with breast cancer are alive in complete remission, 1 with pancreatic cancer is alive with progressive disease, 3 with sarcoma are alive with either complete response s/p surgical resection, partial response or stable disease, 1 with basal cell carcinoma is alive with partial response, 1 with ovarian cancer is alive with partial response, and 1 with glioblastoma is alive receiving first cycle of treatment. Two patients with Stage 4 pancreatic adenocarcinoma who initially failed standard chemotherapy and who were treated with DNG64-CAR-V and low dose chemo lived 8.5-9.5 months, which is similar to the median survival duration of pancreatic cancer patients receiving first line therapy. One patient with metastatic liposarcoma and one patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma who were treated with DNG64-CAR-V and low dose chemo lived 12 months, which is similar to the median survival duration of sarcoma patients receiving first line therapy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -162.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $405K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.